0
Yes, theorems - once they have been proved - are valid evidence.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What type of reasoning does a mathematical proof use?
Deductive reasoning In mathematics, a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement. Deductive reasoning, unlike inductive reasoning, is a valid form of proof. It is, in fact, the way in which geometric proofs are written.
What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
Which types of reasons are not valid in a mathematical proof?
Unproven Theorems
What is sound reasoning in mathematics?
Sound reasoning is correct, valid, logical, believable reasoning.
What are the advantages of modern symbolic logic over classical logic?
What is the major difference between Symbolic logic and Aristotelian logic?1. Traditional Aristotelian logic (also called Classical Deductive Logic or Categorical Syllogisms) is an ancient method of deductive reasoning. Historians say that Aristotle, that ancient Greek philosopher guy, was the first to talk about syllogisms. In ancient Greece, men often first presented their arguments in syllogisms, and then they gave their arguments in a more rhetorical form. Men were held to a higher standard back then. This branch of logic gave us such famous lines of reasoning as:All men are mortal.Socrates is a man.Therefore, Socrates is mortal.2. Modern Symbolic Logic is another method of deductive reasoning developed after the seventeenth century. Gottfried Leibniz and other logicians had a vision for a more simple and useful method for translating ordinary reasoning into a universal language of symbols. Among other things, this method can more quickly analyze longer arguments to see if they are valid. This method of deductive reasoning made logic even more "mathematical." It also made it uglier.This translates into:If p is true, then q is true.p is true.Therefore, q is true.
Is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
Which is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
What type of reasoning does a mathematical proof use?
Deductive reasoning In mathematics, a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement. Deductive reasoning, unlike inductive reasoning, is a valid form of proof. It is, in fact, the way in which geometric proofs are written.
What is a reasonable argument?
A "reasoned argument" is a series of statements that use evidence and reasoning to persuade someone to accept or reject a particular opinion. A special case of a reasoned argument is the valid deductive argument. If you accept the premises of a valid deductive argument, then it would be absurd to reject its conclusion. Unfortunately, in many cases it is impossible to put together a valid deductive argument either for or against some important statement. And so we must muddle along with whatever weaker evidence and weaker reasoning we have available to form a reasoned argument and come to some useful opinion one way or the other. Unfortunately, too many people make statements without any evidence or reasoning at all.
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS A VALID FORM OF EVIDENCE OF DEDUCTIVE REASONING?
A valid deduction is that you posted the question without checking what it said!The question asks about the "following". In those circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that is following?
What is the Advantage of deductive?
Deductive reasoning allows for logical conclusions to be drawn from given premises, ensuring that the argument is valid if the premises are true. It provides a structured approach to reasoning, making it easier to follow and evaluate the logic of an argument. Additionally, deductive reasoning can lead to clear and definitive conclusions when used correctly.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger that inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are assumed to be true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which makes it more prone to errors and uncertainties.
What is proved by utilizing deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning allows for drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises. It proves that if the premises are true and the reasoning is valid, the conclusion must necessarily follow. It is a powerful tool for establishing the logical connections between ideas.
What is meant by deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is a logical process where specific conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises. It involves moving from a general statement to a specific conclusion, with the aim of being logically valid. This type of reasoning is frequently used in mathematics and philosophy.
What Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Deductive reasoning involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to more certain outcomes compared to inductive reasoning, which involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Deductive reasoning follows a top-down approach, moving from the general to the specific, and is commonly used in mathematics and formal logic to guarantee valid conclusions.
What is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
One type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations is called modus ponens. This form of reasoning involves affirming the antecedent to reach a valid conclusion.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
