answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is this True or false a logic error in which a conclusion is not a logical consequence of the evidence is an assumption?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

A deduction based on evidence?

A deduction based on evidence is a logical conclusion drawn from observing facts, data, or information. It involves using reason and logical thinking to arrive at a specific conclusion that is supported by the available evidence. Deductions often follow a "if-then" format, where a premise leads to a definite conclusion.


What is a warranted assumption?

A warranted assumption is an assumption that is supported by evidence or justification, making it reasonable or valid to accept as true for the purpose of an argument or discussion. It is based on logical reasoning or empirical observations.


What conclude mean?

The verb to conclude has two separate meanings : to end, or to make a logical assumption. A concluding act (conclusion) is the final step in a series of activities. Individuals may be concluding that a given situation exists based on the observed evidence.


What is an educted guess?

An educated guess is a hypothesis or prediction based on prior knowledge, reasoning, or evidence, rather than random speculation. It involves making an informed estimate or assumption using available information to arrive at a logical conclusion.


Is therefore a time connective?

Therefore is an adverb it shows a consequence, a result


What is a logical interpretation based on observation?

A logical interpretation based on observation is a conclusion drawn from facts or evidence that aligns with reasoning and common sense. It relies on the information gathered through observation to draw a valid and sound conclusion that is supported by a logical process of thinking.


What is circular argument?

A circular argument is a logical fallacy in which the conclusion is supported by the premise, which in turn is based on the conclusion. It does not provide any new information or evidence to support the argument. It's a form of reasoning that goes in a circle without ever reaching a logical conclusion.


How did the therefore symbol come from?

The symbol for "therefore" ( ∴ ) originated from ancient Greek philosophers, particularly used by Aristotle. It was later adopted in mathematical and logical discourse as a way to signify logical consequence or conclusion. It signifies a logical inference or deduction from the preceding statements.


What is a deductive argument?

A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.


What are the two parts of an argument?

The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.


What are the essential components of a logical argument?

1. Facts 2. reasons 3. evidence


What is the difference between opinion and inference?

An inference is a conclusion drawn from evidence. The logical connection is clear. An opinion need not be based on evidence, or if it is, may not flow from it logically.