answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Given a proposition X, a regular proof known facts and logical arguments to show that X must be true. For an indirect proof, you assume that the negation of X is true. You then use known facts and logical arguments to show that this leads to a contradiction. The conclusion then is that the assumption about ~X being true is false and that is equivalent to showing that X is true.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How does an indirect proof differ from a regular proof?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Fill in the blank A second type of proof in geometry is a proof by or indirect proof?

An indirect proof is a proof by contradiction.


A second type of proof in geometry is a proof by or indirect proof?

contradiction


What is an indirect proof?

An indirect proof is another name for a proof by contradiction. This is where the original premise is assumed to be false and then attempted to be proven. Because this proof turns out to be false, the original premise is then true.


Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you what to prove?

Proof in which one assumes the opposite of what you have to prove is indirect proof. In indirect proof a person can draw a conclusion from assuming the opposite is true and then find a conclusion.


How do you do the indirect proof of ptolemy theorem?

o.o


Is an indirect proof?

The first half of your sentence is missing.


What is a type of proof in which the statement is being proved is assumed to be false?

It is a type of indirect proof: more specifically, a proof by contradiction.


True or false In the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction?

TrueIt is true that the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction. In math a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement.


True or false In the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction.?

TrueIt is true that the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction. In math a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement.


What is another name for a proof of contradiction?

Proof by contradiction is also known by its Latin equivalent, reductio ad absurdum.


How does an indirect proof lead to the desired conclusion?

With an indirect proof, you temporarily assume that the opposite of what you're trying to prove is true. For example, let's say I'm trying to prove that the sky is blue. With an indirect proof, I would first say: "Assume temporarily that sky is not blue..." and go from there. Eventually, I will reach a contradiction and with this contradiction I can assume that this route of thinking is false, therefore my proof must be true.


In the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction?

true