It could be but more details are required.
To determine an ordered pair that could be a solution to an inequality, you need to substitute the values of the ordered pair into the inequality and check if it satisfies the condition. For example, if the inequality is (y < 2x + 3) and the ordered pair is (1, 4), you would substitute (x = 1) and (y = 4) to see if (4 < 2(1) + 3) holds true. If it does, then (1, 4) is a solution; if not, you would need to try another pair.
To determine if an ordered pair ((x, y)) is a solution to the inequality (3y - 1 - 2x \geq 0), we can rearrange it to (3y \geq 2x + 1). For example, if we take the ordered pair ((1, 1)), we substitute (x = 1) and (y = 1): (3(1) \geq 2(1) + 1), which simplifies to (3 \geq 3). Since this is true, ((1, 1)) is a valid solution to the inequality.
To determine which ordered pair could be a solution to the inequality (4y - 3x - 2 > 0), you can substitute the values of the ordered pair into the inequality. For example, if we take the ordered pair (1, 2), substituting gives (4(2) - 3(1) - 2 = 8 - 3 - 2 = 3), which is greater than 0, thus (1, 2) is a solution. You can test other pairs similarly to find more solutions.
Yes, (1-4) can be considered an ordered pair if it is interpreted correctly. Typically, an ordered pair is represented as (a, b), where 'a' and 'b' are values. In this case, if you meant (1, -4), that would indeed be an ordered pair with 1 as the first element and -4 as the second. However, if you meant (1-4) as a single expression, it evaluates to -3, which is not an ordered pair.
The solution to an inequality generally is a region with one more dimension. If the inequality/equation is of the form x < a or x = a then the solution to the inequality is the 1 dimensional line segment while the solution to the equality is a point which has no dimensions. If the inequality/equation is in 2 dimensions, the solution to the inequality is an area whereas the solution to the equality is a 1-d line or curve. And so on, in higher dimensional spaces.
To determine an ordered pair that could be a solution to an inequality, you need to substitute the values of the ordered pair into the inequality and check if it satisfies the condition. For example, if the inequality is (y < 2x + 3) and the ordered pair is (1, 4), you would substitute (x = 1) and (y = 4) to see if (4 < 2(1) + 3) holds true. If it does, then (1, 4) is a solution; if not, you would need to try another pair.
To determine if an ordered pair ((x, y)) is a solution to the inequality (3y - 1 - 2x \geq 0), we can rearrange it to (3y \geq 2x + 1). For example, if we take the ordered pair ((1, 1)), we substitute (x = 1) and (y = 1): (3(1) \geq 2(1) + 1), which simplifies to (3 \geq 3). Since this is true, ((1, 1)) is a valid solution to the inequality.
To determine which ordered pair could be a solution to the inequality (4y - 3x - 2 > 0), you can substitute the values of the ordered pair into the inequality. For example, if we take the ordered pair (1, 2), substituting gives (4(2) - 3(1) - 2 = 8 - 3 - 2 = 3), which is greater than 0, thus (1, 2) is a solution. You can test other pairs similarly to find more solutions.
Substitute the values of the ordered pair into the relation. If the equation is valid then the ordered pair is a solution, and if not then it is not.
It seems there might be a typo in the inequality you provided. If you meant to write (2x + 6y < 10), you can test different ordered pairs (x, y) to see which satisfies the inequality. For example, if you test the pair (1, 1), you would calculate (2(1) + 6(1) = 8), which satisfies the inequality since (8 < 10). Please provide the correct inequality or the ordered pairs for a more accurate assessment.
The equation 2x-5y=-1 has a graph that is a line. Every point on that line is an ordered pair that is a solution to the equation. So pick any real number x and plug it in. You will find a y and that pair (x,y) is an ordered pair that is a solution to this equation. For example, let x=0 Then we have -5y=-1so y=1/5 The ordered pair (0, 1/5) is a point on the line and a solution to the equation.
1/8
y=(-1) x=(2)
Yes, (1-4) can be considered an ordered pair if it is interpreted correctly. Typically, an ordered pair is represented as (a, b), where 'a' and 'b' are values. In this case, if you meant (1, -4), that would indeed be an ordered pair with 1 as the first element and -4 as the second. However, if you meant (1-4) as a single expression, it evaluates to -3, which is not an ordered pair.
The solution to an inequality generally is a region with one more dimension. If the inequality/equation is of the form x < a or x = a then the solution to the inequality is the 1 dimensional line segment while the solution to the equality is a point which has no dimensions. If the inequality/equation is in 2 dimensions, the solution to the inequality is an area whereas the solution to the equality is a 1-d line or curve. And so on, in higher dimensional spaces.
1
To determine if 2 is a solution to the inequality (x), we need to clarify the specific inequality being referenced. If we're considering a simple inequality such as (x > 1), then 2 is indeed a solution because it satisfies the condition. However, if the inequality is (x < 1), then 2 would not be a solution. Please provide the complete inequality for an accurate assessment.