Logically, the term 'trizillion' might be used to describe three (or triple) zillion.
The term 'million' once indicated a huge amount, especially when referring to money. Five decades ago an impressive home could be built for $100,000; a million dollars was a lot of money back then.
Later, millionaires became commonplace and billionaires were the new millionaires. Now it's easier to say multi-billionaire than bother with exact words to describe how much money a person with multi-billions has; individual, government, and corporate wealth can change from day to day and even - in very exciting times - minute to minute.
So we use terms such as 'zillion', 'gazillion', and so on, to describe huge but nowhere-near-exact 'heaps', 'lots', 'countless', or 'never-ending' supplies or occurences of anything. Frequently we use these terms to describe relatively few, but overwhelming, numbers of something: 'We invited thirty, but somebody put it out on Twitter and we ended up with gazillions of people.' Not multi-billions, clearly, but at least over fifty, and too many to cater for.
While 'trizillion' mightn't - at the moment - be much use in maths class, there's no reason it can't join all the other words we need when we want to say there's more of something than we can easily imagine. We can always use more adjectives: look how functional 'humongous' turned out to be.
............................
According to one webpage, 'That number after a trillion is now officially trizillion.' The intention seems to be to describe the next 'set' in a sequence of number sets, as in million, billion, trillion, trizillion, in which case it makes no sense. We already have billion, trillion, quadrillion, quintillion, and so on, in that series (which all have separate meanings in the UK and the US, but we needn't go into that here).
Trizillion certainly isn't 'officially' a word for a number: one webpage doesn't create a word. However, if zillions of people end up using it, it will become, officially, a word.
............................
A positive number. Positive Number x Positive Number = Positive Number Positive Number x Negative Number = Negative Number Negative Number x Negative Number = Positive Number
A real number which is not a rational number is an irrational number.
There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.
The number is 0.6
A multiple of a number is the product of that number and any whole number.
as many as you want
(positive number) x (positive number) = positive number (positive number)/(positive number) = positive number (positive number) x ( negative number) = negative number (positive number)/( negative number) = negative number (negative number) x (negative number) = positive number (negative number)/(negative number) = positive number
atomic number = number of proton in an element number of proton = number of electron mass number = number of proton + number of neutron therefore... atomic number = mass number - number of neutrons
A positive number. Positive Number x Positive Number = Positive Number Positive Number x Negative Number = Negative Number Negative Number x Negative Number = Positive Number
A real number which is not a rational number is an irrational number.
To find the number of neutrons from the mass number, subtract the atomic number from the mass number. The atomic number represents the number of protons in an atom, and by subtracting it from the mass number, you can determine the number of neutrons present.
There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.
A multiple of a number is the product of that number and any whole number.
The number is 0.6
A multiple of a number is the product of that number and any whole number.
A positive number times a positive number will always get you a positive number A negative number times a negative number will always get you a positive number (same signs will get you a positive number) but A positive number times a negative number will always get you a negative number or A negative number times a positive number will always get you a negative number (different signs will get you a negative number)
The mass number of an atom is the sum of the number of protons and neutrons in its nucleus. The atomic number represents the number of protons in an atom, so adding the atomic number to the number of neutrons will give you the mass number.