There is no reason for the surface area to remain the same even if the volume is the same.
not at all
NOOO
You cannot. Cubic meters measure volume and square meters measure area. They are not the same thing.
An area (a 2-dimensional measure) has no volume (3-dimensions) in the same way that a line (1-dimension) has length, but no area, .
There is no reason for the surface area to remain the same even if the volume is the same.
Move to another universe where volume and area are the same thing...
Area is the space in which a thing takes up. Volume is the capacity in which a thing can or is holding
figures with the same volume does not have the same surface area.
its different because a volume is how much and area is the whole thing
yes. its the same thing for surface area too. A way to remember the difference between volume and area is that area is a shorter word so its 2 at the end. volume is a longer word so after the answer you put a 3.
None.There is no such thing as a surface to volume area ration! Furthermore, there is no indication in the question as to what the 6 micrometres refers to.None.There is no such thing as a surface to volume area ration! Furthermore, there is no indication in the question as to what the 6 micrometres refers to.None.There is no such thing as a surface to volume area ration! Furthermore, there is no indication in the question as to what the 6 micrometres refers to.None.There is no such thing as a surface to volume area ration! Furthermore, there is no indication in the question as to what the 6 micrometres refers to.
Yes, they can. They can also have the same surface area, but different volume.
the perimeter of the value is that the area and volume are perpendicular to each other
not at all
NOOO
If they were, then we would not need two different words for the same thing.