The disadvantage of matrix management is that employees can become confused due to conflicting loyalties. The belief is that a properly managed cooperative environment can neutralize these disadvantages. Overall, matrix management typically thought to be an outdated method to organize a company The belief in the 70's and 80's was that a matrix organization would be the best way to manage project complexity. It has been proven to not be true over the years by the failures of companies such as IBM, HP, and AT&T. A matrix organization in itself is complex, breaks down over time, and hinders the ability of managers to effectively lead.
ya yes its there a matrix called zero matrix
A matrix organization is a structure that reflects the complexity of the modern business environment of multiple (often competing) priorities. In the past organizations often had a functional organization inside a particular geography - so the US Marketing manager for a product - say widgets, worked for the US marketing VP who reported to the US President. In a matrix, companies realize that there are different and sometimes competing priorities driven by function, geography, business unit, customer segment etc.. etc.. So that same US Marketing person today may have a reporting line to the Marketing functional head, to the Business line head for widgets, to the US geographic head for profit and loss etc… A matrix then is an orgnaization structure with multiple reporting lines. But the structure itself solves nothing, it just lays out the problem more clearly, I think that all the value of the matrix lies in the way people work together to resolve daily conflicts and trade-offs
A zero matrix is a matrix in which all of the entries are zero.
A sparse matrix is a matrix in which most of the elements are zero.
a squar matrix A is called involutary matrix. if A^2=I
uo[
AllenR Janger has written: 'Matrix organization of complex businesses' -- subject(s): Matrix organization
Matrix is one of the two formats used when creating a format task organization.
In regards to the true statement concerning outline and matrix formats used in creating a formal task organization the most common answer is none of the above. Matrix and summary are the two formats used to create a task organization.
Robert Francis Smith has written: 'The variations of matrix organization' -- subject(s): Case studies, Management, Matrix organization
From the perspective of structure, organizations fall into three categories: 1. Functional organizations 2. Projectized organizations and 3. Matrix organizations. Functional Organizations A functional organization has a traditional organizational structure in which each functional department, such as engineering, marketing, and sales, is a separate entity Projectized Organization A projectized organization's structure is organized around projects. Most of the organization's resources are devoted to the projects Matrix Organization A matrix organization is organized into functional departments, but a project is run by a project team, with members coming from different functional departments The matrix organizations are generally categorized into a strong matrix, which is closer to projectized structure; a weak matrix, which is closer to functional structure; and a balanced matrix, which is in the middle of strong and weak.
What are the merits and demerits of matrix structure of organization
tiana
a hybrid of the functional and product organizations
A format task organization needs two types of formats, a matrix and a summary. Without these two formats, the task organization wouldn't function properly.
In regards to the true statement concerning outline and matrix formats used in creating a formal task organization the most common answer is none of the above. Matrix and summary are the two formats used to create a task organization.
outline and matrix