Suppose x + y + z = 0
then z = - x - y = -(x + y) . . . . . . (A)
1/x + 1/y + 1/z = 0
implies x, y and z are all non-zero: otherwise the reciprocals are undefined.
then z ≠0 implies that x+y ≠0 (by (A))
so 1/x + 1/y + 1/[-(x+y)] = 0 (using (A))
so that 1/x + 1/y = 1/(x+y)
ie (x + y)/xy = 1/(x + y)
Now, since x+y ≠0, multiply both sides by x+y to give
(x + y)2/xy = 1
or (x + y)2 = xy
x2 + 2xy + y2 = xy
x2 + xy + y2 = 0
so that x = [-y ± sqrt(y2 - 4y2)]/2
= [-y ± y*sqrt(-3)]/2 which is cannot be real if y is real.
Cannot prove that 2 divided by 10 equals 2 because it is not true.
a0=(a-1\a-1)=a\a=1
It is extremely difficult to prove things which are not true.
You can't prove it, because it's usually not true.The only time it's true is when x=0 .
that cannot be proved because it is not necessarily true.
There is not much to prove there; opposite numbers, by which I take you mean "additive inverse", are defined so that their sum equals zero.
Cannot prove that 2 divided by 10 equals 2 because it is not true.
You can't it equals 2. You can't it equals 2.
No you can not prove that 9 +10 = 21.
No, but there is a way to prove that zero equals one.
Using faulty logic.
a0=(a-1\a-1)=a\a=1
AAS (apex)
SAS
Using a calculator
It is extremely difficult to prove things which are not true.
You can't prove it, because it's usually not true.The only time it's true is when x=0 .