There is two ways to convert 112 feet to centimeters. The most common way would be 457.2. This is taught in math.
Chat with our AI personalities
Can't be done, an square inch is a unit of area while the kilogram is a unit of mass. Unless you could somehow use relativity to convert area into energy, then into mass...I don't think you can do this. Can't be done, an square inch is a unit of area while the kilogram is a unit of mass. Unless you could somehow use relativity to convert area into energy, then into mass...I don't think you can do this.
This question can be simplified: If you only use one unit multiplier, then your answer is simply 180 inches (36 inches in a yard, 5 yards). If you use two unit multipliers, which takes more time, the process by which you get 180 inches is as follows: 12 inches in a foot, times 3 feet in a yard (36 inches) times 5 yards (180 inches). =========================== But the question did specify the method of solution, which should remind us that learning the method is more important than the answer to little problems like this one. A "unit multiplier" is a fraction with equal numerator and denominator, which is therefore equal to ' 1 ', and you can multiply a measurement by it without changing the value of the measurement. Each of the fractions in the following procedure is equal to ' 1 ': (5 yards) x ( 3 feet/yard ) x (12 inches/foot) = 180 inches
Use this equation to convert degrees Fahrenheit (ºF) to degrees Celsius/Centigrade (ºC): [°C] = ([°F] - 32) × 0.556
Well, the only time you'd use this is in displacement of an irregular solid to find its density. In that case, if a liquid got displaced 200ml, you can convert it to cm3 like this: 200ml=200cm3
You can't convert a distance unit to a time unit. If this is for a speed problem, you would have to know the speed; in this case, use the formula: distance = speed x time.