A triangular prism and a square pyramid.
It gets confusing. In a futile attempt to standardize terminology, use "sides" for 2d figures (the sides of a square), use "edges" for 3d figures (the edges of a prism) and use "faces" for 3d figures (the faces of a tetrahedron).
A tetrahedron (4 triangular faces) is the only polyhedron that has a unique configuration of faces, edges and vertices. For any polyhedron with n (>4) faces, there is a prism with a pair of n-2 sided polygons as bases as well a pyramid whose base is an n-1 sided polygon. There are many other configurations for polyhedra with more faces. For example, there are ten [topologically] different figures with 6 faces: 3 of these are concave polyhedra.
The number of digits in the coefficient should be exactly the same as the number of significant figures.
no
They are square based pyramids
A triangular prism and a square pyramid.
A square and a rectangle as well as other quadrilaterals
It gets confusing. In a futile attempt to standardize terminology, use "sides" for 2d figures (the sides of a square), use "edges" for 3d figures (the edges of a prism) and use "faces" for 3d figures (the faces of a tetrahedron).
A tetrahedron (4 triangular faces) is the only polyhedron that has a unique configuration of faces, edges and vertices. For any polyhedron with n (>4) faces, there is a prism with a pair of n-2 sided polygons as bases as well a pyramid whose base is an n-1 sided polygon. There are many other configurations for polyhedra with more faces. For example, there are ten [topologically] different figures with 6 faces: 3 of these are concave polyhedra.
When adding or multiplying numbers, the result should have the same number of decimal places as the number with the fewest decimal places. For addition, the result should have the same number of significant figures as the number with the fewest significant figures. For multiplication, the result should have the same number of significant figures as the number with the fewest significant figures.
The number of digits in the coefficient should be exactly the same as the number of significant figures.
Yes, they both have 6 faces.
no
This pair does not have the same or the same number of significant figures.
If the conversion factor is exact, then the number of significant figures in the answer is the same as the number of significant figures in the original number.If the conversion factor is an approximation, then the number of significant figures in the result is the lesser of this number and the number of significant figures in the original number.
When multiplying numbers with significant figures, count the total number of significant figures in each number being multiplied. The result should have the same number of significant figures as the number with the fewest significant figures. Round the final answer to that number of significant figures.