Many of them.
The concept of consecutive has no meaning for fractions. This is because there are infinitely many fractions between any two fractions. And between any two of them, there are infinitely many, and so on. As a result, there cannot be any "next" fraction.
When you multiply any two numbers, the answer is their product.
It's impossible to list all fractions, because there are no least or greatest fractions. In addition, between any two fractions, there's another fraction (for example, the average of the two functions).
There is no such thing as THE two fractions. There are infinitely many fractions.
You have to get a common denomanator to then work out if the numerator is also the same.
The concept of consecutive has no meaning for fractions. This is because there are infinitely many fractions between any two fractions. And between any two of them, there are infinitely many, and so on. As a result, there cannot be any "next" fraction.
There is no "after" in the context of fractions. They are infinitely dense: what that means that between any two fractions, there are infinitely many fractions. And between any two of them there are infinitely many, and so on.
There are infinitely many equivalent fractions to any given fraction.
When you multiply any two numbers, the answer is their product.
When you multiply any two numbers, the answer is their product.
It's impossible to list all fractions, because there are no least or greatest fractions. In addition, between any two fractions, there's another fraction (for example, the average of the two functions).
There are infinitely many fractions between any two fractions.
There is no such thing as THE two fractions. There are infinitely many fractions.
There are an infinite number of fractions between any two numbers.
There is no such thing as a "next fraction" because fractions are infinitely dense. Between any two fractions there are infinitely more of them so no two of them can be called "next".
There are infinitely many rational numbers between any two consecutive rational numbers. This is because rational numbers can be expressed as fractions, and between any two fractions, an infinite number of other fractions can be found by taking the average of the two given fractions. Therefore, the set of rational numbers is dense, meaning there is no smallest gap between any two rational numbers.
You have to get a common denomanator to then work out if the numerator is also the same.