The concept of consecutive has no meaning for fractions. This is because there are infinitely many fractions between any two fractions. And between any two of them, there are infinitely many, and so on. As a result, there cannot be any "next" fraction.
Chat with our AI personalities
No. The concept of consecutive makes sense for integers but not for fractions. Fractions are infinitely dense. This means that there are infinitely many fractions between any two numbers - including between any two fractions. So, given one fraction, f1, there cannot be a "next" or "consecutive" fraction, f2, because there are an infinite number of fractions between f1 and f2.
It means you have to subtract fractions.
8 in fractions is simply 8/1.
All sets of 3 consecutive numbers will have the same mean and median
No five consecutive numbers make 77. 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 = 75 and 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 = 80 You cannot consider fractional numbers because the concept of consecutive does not apply to fractions.