Best Answer

Length = 7.5 cm

Width = 5 cm

Check:-

Perimeter = 7.5+7.5+5+5 = 25 cm

Area = 7.5*5 = 37.5 square cm

Q: What are the dimemsions of a rectangle whose length is 2.5 cm greater than its width having a perimeter of 25 cm and an area of 37.5 square cm?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

42.25 cm2

12.25 sq metres.

If a rectangle had a length of 2 and a perimeter of 2, its width would need to be negative 1. However, width, by definition is non-negative and so a width of -1 is impossible. As a result, such a rectangle cannot exist. And since it cannot exist, it cannot have an area.

Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.

There is no such thing as a three sided rectangle. They have four sides. Length and width of a rectangle being THE SAME (having a 1:1 ratio) will provide the largest area possible. In other words, for a given perimeter, a square is the largest rectangle. If you mean a triangle (which has three sides), then all sides being equal will still yield the largest area.

Related questions

30cemtimeters

42.25 cm2

The perimeter of a rectangle having 1,000 units of width and 2,000 units of length is 6,000 units

12.25 sq metres.

If a rectangle had a length of 2 and a perimeter of 2, its width would need to be negative 1. However, width, by definition is non-negative and so a width of -1 is impossible. As a result, such a rectangle cannot exist. And since it cannot exist, it cannot have an area.

Yes it measures 3 on all sides sides across from each other but it would have to be a square. Having a rectangle is impossible. Then again a square is a rectangle but a rectangle isn't a square.

t2 ÷ (2( π + 4) π = pi

1 x 20 2 x 10 4 x 5

Since the largest area would be obtained by having adjacent sides equal to each other, and since a square is at least technically an equilateral rectangle, divide the perimeter of 72 by 4 to get sides of 18 and an area of 324.

Do you mean what are the dimensions because the perimeter has already been given? If so then: length = 8.5 cm and width = 5.5 cm Check: 8.5+8.5+5.5+5.5 = 28 cm

a numerical expression as given above, cannot have a perimeter. perimeter is the outer boundary of a geometrical body. therefore the question shoud have been wots the perimeter of a body having sides 2.5mm and 7.5mm. in that case it depends upon the shape of the figure, if its a rectangle, den 2(2.5+7.5)mm = 2(1)mm= 2mm.

Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.