Theory X is a group of ideas created by Douglas McGreggor in the 1960's. It deals with human motivations. He also discussed theory
discuss the advantages and disadvantages of gregor's theory x of operational organisation
y = sin(x+y) cos( x + y )[(1 + y')] = y' cos(x + y ) + y'cos(x + y ) = y' y'-y'cos( x+ y) = cos( x + y ) y'[1-cos(x+y)]= cos(x+y) y'= [cos(x+y)]/ [1-cos(x+y)]
Given two numbers, x and y their difference is |x - y|. |x - y| = x - y if X ≥ y and |x - y| = y - x if x < y
X + Y (X + Y) ^2 = (X+Y)(X+Y) Factor = (X + Y)
Theory X and Theory Y are two contrasting management theories proposed by Douglas McGregor in the 1960s. Theory X assumes that employees are inherently lazy and need to be closely controlled and directed. Theory Y, on the other hand, assumes that employees are self-motivated and can be trusted to take initiative and responsibility in their work.
I*I = x*x + y*y + z*z - t*t
example of theory X is the toyota company example of theory Y is Google company Ashraf
x= people are lazy and must be motivated and closely supervised Y= people want to do a good job, try to avoid doing things thad kill that motivation. A theory X manager with theory Y subordinates will soon beat the motivation out of them, thus proving to himself that he was right all along. A theory Y manager will eventually figure out that a theory X subordinate thinks all people are lazy because that subordinate is lazy himself. Thus, teams are best structured with all X of all Y types. The Y teams will consistently outperform the X teams.
x assumes employees are unmotivated etc and have to be handled with severity like prison inmates Y assumes employees want to be productive, helpful and creative and can be managed to maximize these efforts. A theory X manager will soon beat the motivation out of a theory Y worker, thus proving to himself that X was right all along. A theory Y manager will eventually figure out that a theory X worker believes people are unmotivated because the worker himself is unmotivated. Thus, it is better for work teams to be all X or all Y. Given that, the Y teams will out produce the X teams.
One criticism of McGregor's Theory X is that it creates diseconomies of scale in large applications. One criticism of McGregor's Theory Y is that it may not be possible for the superior-subordinate relationship to flower organically.
McGregor's Theory X suggests that employees are lazy, need to be micromanaged, and prefer to be directed rather than take initiative. In contrast, Theory Y posits that employees are inherently motivated, responsible, and seek out challenges in their work. Theory Y aligns more with a participative management style, while Theory X is more authoritarian.
Theory X is based on a general dislike people have of work, lack of ambition, selfishness, resistance to change, and a lack of intelligence. In contrast, Theory Y is based on the idea that people can enjoy work, be self-directed, committed, desire responsibility, and is inventive. Both of these theories assume that the right set of circumstances needs to be applied to help a person become motivated and reach their true potential.
The McGregor's theory x implies that workers need close supervision because they are not self motivated by nature. The theory y implies that there is no need for close supervision because employees can generally motivate themselves to meet targets.
Theory X is a group of ideas created by Douglas McGreggor in the 1960's. It deals with human motivations. He also discussed theory
McGregor's Theory X posits that employees inherently dislike work, avoid responsibility, and need to be closely monitored and controlled. On the other hand, Theory Y suggests that employees are motivated, enjoy work, seek out responsibility, and can be creative when given the opportunity. Theory X is more pessimistic and traditional, while Theory Y is more positive and modern in its approach to managing employees.
The assumption that Theory X and Theory Y about workers influences management styles. The assumptions of these two theories differ from employee motivation as well as satisfying employees' needs.