if divide the prime numbers by the compositenumber it will give you a greater number that is either a prime number or composite.
As a product of its prime factors in exponents: 23*52 = 200
2 x 5 x 5 = 50
Prime numbers are numbers that can only be multiplied by 1 and itself (whole numbers only) to give the same result 49 (7x7) and 81 (9x9) are not a prime number (perfect squares actually) 111 and 97 are a prime number (find me two numbers that gives the same product without using the number 1)
Square numbers can't be prime. They have too many factors.
if divide the prime numbers by the compositenumber it will give you a greater number that is either a prime number or composite.
Express them as a product of their prime factors; give the prime factorization. Example: 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 = 210
3,5and11
37 x 41
As a product of its prime factors in exponents: 23*52 = 200
2 x 5 x 5 = 50
This question is based on a misunderstanding. Most cryptography is based on numbers that are products of two very large prime numbers. Being the product of two primes means that these numbers are composite - not prime!
Prime numbers are numbers that can only be multiplied by 1 and itself (whole numbers only) to give the same result 49 (7x7) and 81 (9x9) are not a prime number (perfect squares actually) 111 and 97 are a prime number (find me two numbers that gives the same product without using the number 1)
The prime numbers 2 and 3.
The expression 2x3x4x5 can be simplified to 120. The number 120 has the least number of factors because it is a product of consecutive prime numbers (2, 3, and 5). When a number is a product of distinct prime numbers, it will have fewer factors compared to numbers with repeated prime factors. In this case, 120 only has 16 factors, making it the least among numbers with the same number of prime factors.
numbers that are multipied together to give a product are called factors
18 prime numbers