There no difference at all. Imax just has a bigger screen and better sound. In my opinon i would prefer RealD 3D
This is a total matter of opinon. 3D gives better graphics, but 2D is easier to draw or make.
Its better in the middle
Paper is a 3D object.
a Sphere is a 3d circle
There no difference at all. Imax just has a bigger screen and better sound. In my opinon i would prefer RealD 3D
Yes, they are the RealD glasses.
RealD is a leading technology developer and supplier of quality 3D visualization tools. The website provides information on the products available from RealD.
Not unless you have a computer screen that runs at 120 Hertz and supports the RealD 3D and have an NeonVidia GeForce 8000 or better.
RealD was created in 2003.
3d is 3d. its just 2 images one for left and one for right. RealD is one system for taking the 2 images and polarising them to block the opposite eye. Most home theatre systems have been using XpandD aka flicker or shutter, which uses a synchronised LCD shutter in the glasses to block opposite eye. JVC developed a polarising system for the home that uses alternating rows of polarising filters in the TV screen itself. this system allows you to use RealD glasses at home. however it also reduces the image quality in half, making your 1080 into 540 or standard def.
The symbol for RealD Inc in the NYSE is: RLD.
RealD Inc (RLD)had its IPO in 2010.
No
As of July 2014, the market cap for RealD Inc (RLD) is $522,918,170.56.
qube 3d is better
I've seen a video of a guy with a 42' inch Vizio using RealD 3D glasses and it looked good through the camera. The video has a lot of likes So it must have worked for many others. But I can't seem to get it working the same way on my 24' Playstation Display.