They look the exact same if you are not sure measure them and see
The lengths of the sides need not be congruent. For example, consider a square and a rectangle.
No, something could be similar to something else, but be bigger. To be congruent they need to be the exactly the same.
You need only know the radius of each circle to determine that they are congruent. If the radii are identical, the circles are identical. This can also be determined by comparing the diameters (twice the radii), or the circumferences, or the areas of the circles. In all cases, if the parameters are identical, the circles are identical.
One shape cannot be congruent: you need two (or more) shapes which can be congruent to each other.
no because if the shape is changed it wouldn't be a translation it wouldn't be congruent and you need it congruent or else it wouldn't be a translation. thank you for reading my answer i really needed this for my homework i had it in my mind but, i forgot it so i decided to look it up and answered my own question. THAT IS MY ANSWER BYE!
The lengths of the sides need not be congruent. For example, consider a square and a rectangle.
No, something could be similar to something else, but be bigger. To be congruent they need to be the exactly the same.
A pyramid need not have any congruent sides.A pyramid need not have any congruent sides.A pyramid need not have any congruent sides.A pyramid need not have any congruent sides.
We don't know what has already been proven congruent, sowe're in no position to be able to say what elseis required.
For a start, you would need to know what efg and jkl are.
No, they are similar. They may be congruent, but they need not be.
You need calculate the area of only one face and multiply the result by the number of congruent faces.
You need only know the radius of each circle to determine that they are congruent. If the radii are identical, the circles are identical. This can also be determined by comparing the diameters (twice the radii), or the circumferences, or the areas of the circles. In all cases, if the parameters are identical, the circles are identical.
One shape cannot be congruent: you need two (or more) shapes which can be congruent to each other.
No. You can know all three angles of both and all you can say is that the triangles are similar. Or with any pair of congruent sides you can have an acute angle between them or an obtuse angle.
no because if the shape is changed it wouldn't be a translation it wouldn't be congruent and you need it congruent or else it wouldn't be a translation. thank you for reading my answer i really needed this for my homework i had it in my mind but, i forgot it so i decided to look it up and answered my own question. THAT IS MY ANSWER BYE!
If they have the same degrees than they're congruent. There are many possibilites. It depends where the angle is placed. Let say that you don't know the measurement of the angle and there are two parrallel lines with another line crossing (transversal). Rules/ Theorems state that consecutive interior/exterior, alternative interior/exterior are all congruent. Vertical angles are also congruent. Etc.. You just need to know the properties of the shape or know the prob. If i don't know the situation, i can't point you to which theorem you should use.