There is a serious flaw in the "double-equation". 8.6 = 5p - 4p = 2.4 It would imply that 8.6 = 2.4 which is clearly not true.
The equations are inconsistent. If you divide the first equation by 2, you get y + 4x - 6 = 0 or 4x + y - 6 = 0 or 4x + y = 6 The second equation, however, gives 4x + y = -6 The two equations, taken together would imply that 6 = -6 which is false.
That is the equation of a straight line intersecting the axis at (4,0) and (0,-4). There is no "answer" as such; an "answer" would imply that you require specific values for x and y at a certain place (e.g where this line meets another line), which clearly cannot be answered with the details given: you have two variables (x and y) and one equation. You MUST have at least the same number of equations as variables in order to solve for x, y etc...
S equals -10t2 plus vt plus k This is one of the three formulae for motion. The standard form is S = ut + 1/2ft2. S = distance, u = initial velocity, f = acceleration, t = time, k is unknown. The equation in the question could thus be written, S = ut - 10t2 +k. This would imply that the acceleration is -10.
Implication is the noun form of "imply."
! I was actually thinking about the same thing with this Einsteins equation: E = mc^2 -> E = ms^2/t^2 -> t^2 = (m*s^2)/E -> simplified: t = (m*s) / E That would imply that time is matter! ...Matter in space and has energy. That would also imply, that time would be a property of matter!
E=mc^2 states that mass and energy are interchangeable, and that a little bit of mass creates a lot of energy.
There is a serious flaw in the "double-equation". 8.6 = 5p - 4p = 2.4 It would imply that 8.6 = 2.4 which is clearly not true.
It equals 10.50! It could equal 10.5 but that would imply a lower degree of precision.
The equations are inconsistent. If you divide the first equation by 2, you get y + 4x - 6 = 0 or 4x + y - 6 = 0 or 4x + y = 6 The second equation, however, gives 4x + y = -6 The two equations, taken together would imply that 6 = -6 which is false.
With a huge amount of difficulty because, as an identity, the equation is false. For example, let d = 1 and v = 1. The equation would then imply that 2 + 4 - 3 = 5 - 1 or 3 = 4 which is patently false.
energy can neither be created nor we destroy That energy can only be converted between different forms ~Apex
4
Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "equals", "squared", "cubed" etc.In this case it is not possible between2y = -6x (?) 8and2y (?) -6x = 8where (?) is + or -.These two equations imply different gradients and therefore the equation of the required line.Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "equals", "squared", "cubed" etc.In this case it is not possible between2y = -6x (?) 8and2y (?) -6x = 8where (?) is + or -.These two equations imply different gradients and therefore the equation of the required line.Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "equals", "squared", "cubed" etc.In this case it is not possible between2y = -6x (?) 8and2y (?) -6x = 8where (?) is + or -.These two equations imply different gradients and therefore the equation of the required line.Unfortunately, limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. It is therefore impossible to give a proper answer to your question. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "equals", "squared", "cubed" etc.In this case it is not possible between2y = -6x (?) 8and2y (?) -6x = 8where (?) is + or -.These two equations imply different gradients and therefore the equation of the required line.
His demeanor seemed to imply the worst. I would not imply that.
The connotation of energy often carries positive associations of vitality, enthusiasm, and dynamism. It can also imply power, strength, and a high level of activity or productivity.
That is the equation of a straight line intersecting the axis at (4,0) and (0,-4). There is no "answer" as such; an "answer" would imply that you require specific values for x and y at a certain place (e.g where this line meets another line), which clearly cannot be answered with the details given: you have two variables (x and y) and one equation. You MUST have at least the same number of equations as variables in order to solve for x, y etc...