An infinite number. If I count to one trillion, I can always count to one trillion one.
Yes they are, if they are large numbers. You do not need to count how many digits there are.
That gives a better overview. It's easier to compare two large numbers (or small numbers) written in scientific notation than if they are written out. When the numbers are written out, you have to count digits, which can be slow, error-prone, and basically useless. When the number is in scientific notation, the counting has basically already been done for you. To compare two numbers in normalized scientific notation, just compare the exponents.
In representing large numbers, English texts use commas (or spaces) to separate each group of three digits. This is almost always done for numbers of six or more digits, and optionally for five (or even four) digits. This makes it easier to read the number without having to count how many place holders there are in the number as a whole.
To express astronomically large numbers in smaller context to do high level mathematical calculations mainly in space, it also used to calculate things on the opposite spectrum with small particles.
Dust particles are countable because they are discrete entities that can be physically separated and individually distinguished from one another. When discussing the number of dust particles, each individual speck or particle can be identified and quantified, making them countable.
An infinite number. If I count to one trillion, I can always count to one trillion one.
it gives him a more accurate description of the living plant.
Yes they are, if they are large numbers. You do not need to count how many digits there are.
Well with a simple calculation factor we can keep track of how many molecules there are (avagadro's number), and at the same time, we don't have to deal with ridiculously large numbers
To show very large or very small numbers, without writing out all the digits. To make it easy to compare such numbers, without having to count all the digits.
made up of course, large soil particles
Not at all! Particles are tiny little things
Large particles have less total surface area, so caused less friction then the smaller particles do
Obviously "large numbers"
A liquid typically consists of a very large number of particles, ranging from millions to billions to even trillions, depending on the volume and type of liquid. These particles are constantly in motion and are closely packed together but not rigidly arranged like in a solid.
They're simply used for clarity - to make the number easier to read.