To prove a statement by contradiction one begins by assuming the statement is not true. Contradiction is the act of giving the opposing something that you feel is not right.
opposite
True. In an indirect proof, also known as a proof by contradiction, you start by assuming that the opposite (or converse) of what you want to prove is true. Then, you logically derive a contradiction from that assumption, which shows that the original statement must be true.
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is "proof by contradiction." In this method, you start by assuming that the statement you want to prove is false. Then, by logically deriving a contradiction from that assumption, you conclude that the original statement must be true. This technique is commonly used in various fields of mathematics and logic.
True. To begin an indirect proof, you assume the opposite (or inverse) of what you intend to prove is true. This assumption leads to a contradiction, thereby demonstrating that the original statement must be true.
Another name for a proof by contradiction is "reductio ad absurdum." This method involves assuming the opposite of what you want to prove, demonstrating that this assumption leads to a contradiction, and thereby concluding that the original statement must be true. It is a powerful technique often used in mathematical and logical arguments.
opposite
The first step to indirectly proving a statement, often through proof by contradiction, is to assume the opposite of what you want to prove. This means you begin by assuming that the statement is false. From this assumption, you then derive logical consequences, aiming to reach a contradiction or an impossible scenario. If a contradiction is found, it indicates that the original statement must be true.
To prove by contradiction, you assume that an opposite assumption is true, then disprove the opposite statement.
True. In an indirect proof, also known as a proof by contradiction, you start by assuming that the opposite (or converse) of what you want to prove is true. Then, you logically derive a contradiction from that assumption, which shows that the original statement must be true.
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is "proof by contradiction." In this method, you start by assuming that the statement you want to prove is false. Then, by logically deriving a contradiction from that assumption, you conclude that the original statement must be true. This technique is commonly used in various fields of mathematics and logic.
Yes, that's how it is done. Assuming the contrary should eventually lead you to some contradiction.
True. To begin an indirect proof, you assume the opposite (or inverse) of what you intend to prove is true. This assumption leads to a contradiction, thereby demonstrating that the original statement must be true.
Another name for a proof by contradiction is "reductio ad absurdum." This method involves assuming the opposite of what you want to prove, demonstrating that this assumption leads to a contradiction, and thereby concluding that the original statement must be true. It is a powerful technique often used in mathematical and logical arguments.
The term that best describes this type of proof is "proof by contradiction." In this method, you start by assuming that the statement you wish to prove is false. By logically deducing consequences from this assumption, you aim to reach a contradiction, thereby demonstrating that the original statement must be true. This approach is commonly used in mathematics to establish the validity of propositions.
False. In an indirect proof, you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is true. This method involves showing that this assumption leads to a contradiction, thereby confirming that the original statement must be true.
Another name for an indirect proof is a proof by contradiction. In this method, the assumption of the opposite of what you want to prove is made, leading to a logical contradiction. This contradiction implies that the original statement must be true.
True. In an indirect proof, also known as proof by contradiction, you assume that the opposite of what you want to prove is true. Then, you show that this assumption leads to a contradiction, thereby demonstrating that the original statement must be true. This method effectively highlights the validity of the claim by eliminating the possibility of its inverse being true.