0
What else can I help you with?
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by ASA?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. no correct
Are all similar geometric figures are also congruent?
No, something could be similar to something else, but be bigger. To be congruent they need to be the exactly the same.
Can figures have congruent angles but not be congruent figures?
The lengths of the sides need not be congruent. For example, consider a square and a rectangle.
Is a nonagon congruent?
One shape cannot be congruent: you need two (or more) shapes which can be congruent to each other.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to congruent to show that abc equals pqr by sss?
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg jkl by sss?
For a start, you would need to know what efg and jkl are.
What else would need to be congruent to show abc is congruent to def by AAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc pqr by sss?
Bc= qr
What else would need to be congruent to show that efg pqr by asa?
bc yz
What else would need to be congruent to show that stu jkl by sas?
Su jL
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc xyz by sas?
Line segment BC is congruent to Line Segment YZ
What else would need to be congruent to show that STU congruent JKL by sas?
We don't know what has already been proven congruent, sowe're in no position to be able to say what elseis required.
