0
What else can I help you with?
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by the aas theorem?
To show that triangles ABC and DEF are congruent by the AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the non-included side of the other triangle. If you have already shown two angles congruent, you would need to prove that one of the sides opposite one of those angles in triangle ABC is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle DEF. This additional information will complete the criteria for applying the AAS theorem.
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by ASA?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. no correct
What is the meaning of AAA Similarity Theorem?
If three angles of one triangle are congruent to three angles of another triangle then by the AAA similarity theorem, the two triangles are similar. Actually, you need only two angles of one triangle being congruent to two angle of the second triangle.
Is it true triangles satisfying SSA are congruent?
No. SSA is ambiguous. Unless A = 90 degrees, there are two possible configurations for the triangle. So they need not be congruent.
What else would you to need to show triangle efg congruent to triangle hij by sss?
D). Eg = hj
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC equals triangle XYZ by aas?
Nicki Minaj
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by Angle Side Angle?
Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc equals xyz by sas?
bh=ws
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that jkl mno by aas?
AAS is equal to angle-angle-side, and is descriptive of a triangle. JKL and MNO would be the sides and angles of a triangle. The two sides must be congruent to the opposite angle.
Does a triangle have to congruent angles?
yes, only the isosceles triangle has two congruent angles. But triangles don't need any congruent angles
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What defines a congruent triangle?
All corresponding sides and all interior angles are congruent. But in order to have a congruent triangle, we need two or more triangles that fit these requirements.
What else would need to congruent to show that abc equals pqr by sss?
That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.
