²⁄₁₀ cannot be written as a whole number, but it can be written as a decimal: 0.2
425 is a whole number. It cannot be written as a mixed number.
7/4 is not a whole number, and thus cannot be written as such. It can, however, be written as a mixed number. In this case, it would be written as 4 3/4.
3 does not go into 32 so 32/3 cannot be written as a whole number.
133 is a whole number and so can be written as in the question. That form cannot be simplified.
²⁄₁₀ cannot be written as a whole number, but it can be written as a decimal: 0.2
425 is a whole number. It cannot be written as a mixed number.
12/5 cannot be a whole number. it can be written as 2 2/5 or 2.4.
7/4 is not a whole number, and thus cannot be written as such. It can, however, be written as a mixed number. In this case, it would be written as 4 3/4.
3 does not go into 32 so 32/3 cannot be written as a whole number.
133 is a whole number and so can be written as in the question. That form cannot be simplified.
No it cannot. Any whole number, n, can be written as the ratio n/1 where n is an integer. Since it can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, it is rational and so cannot be irrational.
900 is a whole number and cannot be written as a decimal. 900.0
A rational number can be written as (one whole number) divided by (another whole number). An irrational number can't.
Since 52 is not divisible by 7, 52 over 7 is a mixed fraction. It cannot be written as a whole number for the simple reason that it is not a whole number.
900 cannot be written in decimal form because it is a whole number.
1.5 is not a whole number and cannot be converted to a whole number.