If you've gone 42 miles then you've gone 42 miles and the equivalence in kilometers is irrelevant.However, I guess one of the miles in your question ought to have been kilometers:How many KILOMETERS would you have travelled if you went 42 miles?0.6 miles = 1 km → 42 miles = 42 ÷ 0.6 km = 70 kmHow many miles would you have travelled if you went 42 KILOMETERS?1 km = 0.6 miles → 42 km = 42 × 0.6 miles = 25.2 miles
You would still have travelled 42 miles but 42/0.6 is equivalent to 70 kilometers,
1 mile = 1.609344 km (exactly) → 42 miles - 42 × 1.609344 km ≈ 67.6 km
(42 miles/hour) x (1 hour) or 42 miles.
42 minutes
42 * 0 = 0
Chicago is at 41° 59' N latitude. The equator is a 0°N.Basically, it's 42°(1° in latitude change is 69.2 miles) * 69.2 miles = 2,906.4 miles
If you've gone 42 miles then you've gone 42 miles and the equivalence in kilometers is irrelevant.However, I guess one of the miles in your question ought to have been kilometers:How many KILOMETERS would you have travelled if you went 42 miles?0.6 miles = 1 km → 42 miles = 42 ÷ 0.6 km = 70 kmHow many miles would you have travelled if you went 42 KILOMETERS?1 km = 0.6 miles → 42 km = 42 × 0.6 miles = 25.2 miles
42 miles is 67.6km
It is 0. The hundreds, on either side of 42, are: 100*0 = 0 and 100*1 = 100 The distance from 42 to 0 is 42 - 0 = 42 The distance from 42 to 100 is 100 - 42 = 58 So the first of these is the nearest.
42 miles=67.592448 kilometers
42 kilometers = 26.0975901 miles
42 kilometers = 26.0975901 miles
You would still have travelled 42 miles but 42/0.6 is equivalent to 70 kilometers,
42 meters = 0.0260975901 miles.
1/3 x 42 = 14 miles.
42 miles