That statement itself is an equation, and there are an infinite number
of (x, y) pairs of numbers that satisfy it.
To draw a graph of the equation, draw a straight line that rises toward the
right at an angle of 45° and passes through [ y = -1/4 ] on the y-axis.
The x-value and y-value of every point on that line satisfy your equation.
(And we all know how many points there are on a line. Particularly on a line
that has no ends.)
It is a single equation of direct proportionality. It cannot be solved since that would require two linear equations.
The 1st step would be to give an example of the equation to be solved.
There's nothing to solve, because there's no equation there. All we have is a 4th degree expression in 'x'. Its numerical value depends on the value of 'x'. An algebra teacher may ask you to factor it, but then the question would come from the teacher, not from the expression. If there were an 'equals' sign ( ' = ' ) somewhere here, then we would have an equation, and there would be something to solve.
The classical problem of angle trisection cannot be solved. If it were possible, it would provide the solution to a cubic equation. (-but it isn't and it won't!)
When solved by substitution: x = 4/3 and y = 5/3 From equation 2, y = 2x - 1 Substituting this expression for y in equation 1 gives 5x -(2x - 1) = 5 this simplifies to 3x + 1 = 5 making x = 4/3 and y = 5/3
The equation can be solved by isolating the variables from the numbers. The answer would be 4x = 8, which equals 2.
It is a single equation of direct proportionality. It cannot be solved since that would require two linear equations.
The 1st step would be to give an example of the equation to be solved.
There is no equation (or inequality) in the question. Consequently there is nothing that can be solved.
This can't be solved. There is no other side to the equation. If the problem stated y-18=32, then it could be solved and the answer would be y=50.
This is not an equation since there is no equals sign. This means it is an expression, which can't be solved, only simplified. Even if it were an equation, there are two variables in this expression, so without knowing the values for both variables, we would not know if 67 is a solution.
If: n3 = 8 Then: n = 2
There's nothing to solve, because there's no equation there. All we have is a 4th degree expression in 'x'. Its numerical value depends on the value of 'x'. An algebra teacher may ask you to factor it, but then the question would come from the teacher, not from the expression. If there were an 'equals' sign ( ' = ' ) somewhere here, then we would have an equation, and there would be something to solve.
The classical problem of angle trisection cannot be solved. If it were possible, it would provide the solution to a cubic equation. (-but it isn't and it won't!)
No but you can simplify the equation by a sixth and the equation would end up as one fourth
Equal sums on both sides of the equation would be 29 + 29 = 58
It could be y = -x+5