Zero
It's more of an arithmetic expression, however, 2x0 + 3x0 = y would be algebraic.
no just write zero. or maybe like an example 2x0=0
most commonly you would place the highest exponent first. x0 = 1. 54x3 + 62x2 - 344x + 2 = 0
2x-y=14, x=0 First, substitute 0 in place of x. (2x0)-y=14 Multiply 2 times 0. 0-y=14 That gives you... -y=14 Because we are solving for y, and y must be positive, divide each side by -1. -y/-1=14/-1 And, our result... y=-14
it is zero oh and im a kid
The answer is 2. 2x = 2x1 So you follow the usual rule about bring down the exponent and subtract one from it and you get 1*2x0= 2x0=2
Zero
The cast of 2x0 - 2013 includes: Marta Flich as Lola
2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+(2x0) =2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+0 =24
It's more of an arithmetic expression, however, 2x0 + 3x0 = y would be algebraic.
2x0+300 = 900 Solving the equation: 2x0 = 600 So the measures of the angles are: 90 degrees, 60 degrees and 30 degrees.
no just write zero. or maybe like an example 2x0=0
I'm assuming the equation is 10 - 2x = 0? If that's the case, the answer is 5 (not -5)
most commonly you would place the highest exponent first. x0 = 1. 54x3 + 62x2 - 344x + 2 = 0
double the number of itself , but when it is 1 or 0 , for 1 , you get 1 , for 0 you get 0 . Meaning for example , 1 . 1x1=1 2x1=2 3x1=3 4x1=4 The 2nd example would be , 1x0=0 2x0=0 3x0=0 4x0=0
74 is not divisible by 4; but704 is divisible by 4.74: 2x7+ 4 = 18; 2x1 + 8 = 10; 2x1 + 0 = 2 which is not 4 nor 8, so 74 is NOT divisible by 4704: 2x0 + 4 = 4 which is 4 or 8, so 704 IS divisible by 4