I think it says a little more than that. b, the denominator of the rational number a/b, cannot be equal to zero because division by zero is undefined.
A mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/CA mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/CA mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/CA mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/C
b*ab = ab2 Suppose b*ab = ab + b2. Assume a and b are non-zero integers. Then ab2 = ab + b2 b = 1 + b/a would have to be true for all b. Counter-example: b = 2; a = 3 b(ab) = 2(3)(2) = 12 = ab2 = (4)(3) ab + b2 = (2)(3) + (2) = 10 but 10 does not = 12. Contradiction. So it cannot be the case that b = 1 + b/a is true for all b and, therefore, b*ab does not = ab + b2
The question cannot be answered since it is inconsistent. It first states that AB equals 5 cm and then AB equals 6 cm. Please check your typing and resubmit.
It is the set of rational numbers.
I think it says a little more than that. b, the denominator of the rational number a/b, cannot be equal to zero because division by zero is undefined.
Repeating decimal
ab Link
A mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/CA mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/CA mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/CA mixed number of the form AB/C, as an improper fraction, is equal to (AC + B)/C
b*ab = ab2 Suppose b*ab = ab + b2. Assume a and b are non-zero integers. Then ab2 = ab + b2 b = 1 + b/a would have to be true for all b. Counter-example: b = 2; a = 3 b(ab) = 2(3)(2) = 12 = ab2 = (4)(3) ab + b2 = (2)(3) + (2) = 10 but 10 does not = 12. Contradiction. So it cannot be the case that b = 1 + b/a is true for all b and, therefore, b*ab does not = ab + b2
yes that's absoloutly correct
The question cannot be answered since it is inconsistent. It first states that AB equals 5 cm and then AB equals 6 cm. Please check your typing and resubmit.
It is the set of rational numbers.
ab=1a+1b a is equal to either 0 or two, and b is equal to a
It's -(ab/3) . The actual number that it is depends on the values of 'a' and 'b'. As soon as either of them changes, -(ab/3) also immediately changes.
If a, b, c and d are all non-zero then ab = CD if and only if a/c = d/b or (equivalently) a/d = b/c
You always need to start with something when doing math, most people use a set of axioms known as Peano axioms. The 5th one says 0 is a natural number. These axioms are the basis of math as we now know it. They are the things we assume to be true. Answer 2: Prove existence of zero Suppose, to the contrary that zero does not exist. Further suppose that a=b. Then: ab = b^2 a^2 - ab = a^2 - b^2 a( a - b ) = (a+b)(a-b). Now, since we supposed that zero does not exist, (a-b) must be equal to some number other than zero. Therefore, a = (a+b) (We divide both sides by a-b, which, by supposition, is a non-zero number). a = (a+a) (a=b, We supposed that a=b is a given) 1a = 2a 1 = 2. We have 1=2, an obvious contradiction, therefore, zero does exist.