Best Answer

In a certain sense, the set of complex numbers is "larger" than the set of real numbers, since the set of real numbers is a proper subset of it.

Q: What is A set of numbers that is larger than the set of real numbers?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Yes, rational numbers are larger than integer because integers are part of rational numbers.

The set of irrational numbers is larger than the set of rational numbers, as proved by Cantor: The set of rational numbers is "countable", meaning there is a one-to-one correspondence between the natural numbers and the rational numbers. You can put them in a sequence, in such a way that every rational number will eventually appear in the sequence. The set of irrational numbers is uncountable, this means that no such sequence is possible. All rational and irrationals (ie real numbers) are a subset of complex numbers. Complex numbers, in turn, are part of a larger group, and so on.

No. The set of real numbers contains an infinitely more irrational numbers than rational numbers.

The complement of a set refers to everything that is NOT in the set. A "universe" (a set from which elements may be taken) must always be specified (perhaps implicitly). For example, if your "universe" is the real numbers, and the set you are considering is 0

Are disjoint and complementary subsets of the set of real numbers.

Related questions

If you mean larger by "the set of whole numbers strictly contains the set of natural numbers", then yes, but if you mean "the set of whole numbers has a larger cardinality (size) than the set of natural numbers", then no, they have the same size.

Yes, rational numbers are larger than integer because integers are part of rational numbers.

For me, the biggest set of numbers is the set of REAL numbers. That includes every single number - positive, negative, whole, fraction, decimal, rational, irrational, numbers like pi and 'e' - except for IMAGINARY numbers. The set of REAL numbers is infinitely large and you can't get any bigger than that.

The set of irrational numbers is larger than the set of rational numbers, as proved by Cantor: The set of rational numbers is "countable", meaning there is a one-to-one correspondence between the natural numbers and the rational numbers. You can put them in a sequence, in such a way that every rational number will eventually appear in the sequence. The set of irrational numbers is uncountable, this means that no such sequence is possible. All rational and irrationals (ie real numbers) are a subset of complex numbers. Complex numbers, in turn, are part of a larger group, and so on.

real numbers

No. The set of real numbers contains an infinitely more irrational numbers than rational numbers.

the set of real numbers

The complement of a set refers to everything that is NOT in the set. A "universe" (a set from which elements may be taken) must always be specified (perhaps implicitly). For example, if your "universe" is the real numbers, and the set you are considering is 0

It cannot be. The cardinality of the set of real numbers is the Continuum. This is greater than the total number of sub-atomic particles in the universe!

There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.

Are disjoint and complementary subsets of the set of real numbers.

Real numbers are a proper subset of Complex numbers.