The definition of an irrational number is that it cannot be expressed as the quotient of 2 integers, so no.
It is an incomplete definition of a rational number.
Probably because that's more or less the definition of "rational number": a number that can be expressed as a ratio of integers.
Even numbers are always integers, by definition.
There are two conflicting definitions of a "natural number": these are "The set of positive integers", or "The set of non-negative integers".According to the first definition, the list of positive integers does not include 0. However, according to the second definition, this does include zero.
That's the definition of a "rational number".
a whole number negative or positive
The definition of an irrational number is that it cannot be expressed as the quotient of 2 integers, so no.
It is an incomplete definition of a rational number.
Probably because that's more or less the definition of "rational number": a number that can be expressed as a ratio of integers.
Even numbers are always integers, by definition.
There are two conflicting definitions of a "natural number": these are "The set of positive integers", or "The set of non-negative integers".According to the first definition, the list of positive integers does not include 0. However, according to the second definition, this does include zero.
The definition of a rational number is the quotient of any two nonzero integers.
By definition, integers are whole numbers as they have no fraction part.
Rational. Any number that is the ratio of two integers is by definition rational. For example, -2/3 is the ratio of -2 to 3.Answer 1irrational
Integers are a subset of the set of all rational numbers. By definition, a rational number can be exactly expressed as the ratio of two integers. Only if the ratio can be simplified so that the denominator is 1 is a rational number an integer.
This is the definition of the set of 'Integers'.