Kush was conquered by Askum.
If a statement is true, then its negation is false. The negation of a statement is essentially the opposite of that statement; it asserts that the original statement is not true. Therefore, if the original statement holds true, the negation cannot hold true simultaneously.
In computing, this is an AND statement.
true
No, it is not a true statement. It is a false statement.
In its early history, Greece was not united because of the isolation that was caused by the mountainous terrain.
A statement that is not true about the success of the Jamestown colony is that it was immediately prosperous and self-sustaining upon its establishment in 1607. In reality, Jamestown faced significant challenges, including famine, disease, and conflicts with Indigenous peoples, leading to a near-collapse in its early years. It wasn't until the introduction of tobacco cultivation and strong leadership, such as that from John Smith and later John Rolfe, that the colony began to find economic stability.
The statement that is true of Jamestown is that Black slaves were brought to Jamestown in 1619. This marked the beginning of a system of forced labor in the English colonies. Sir Francis Drake did not found Jamestown; it was established in 1607. Additionally, while John Smith played a significant role in Jamestown's early survival, it was actually John Rolfe who is credited with introducing tobacco as a cash crop.
Kush was conquered by Askum.
They were early iterations of tabloid journalism.
Yes...True
They were paid less than men. apex
Yes, it is true that the statement "640k ought to be enough for anybody" was famously attributed to Bill Gates in the early days of computing.
Yes
They were bustling with economic and cultural activity.
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true