No, it's not possible that a double-headed quarter with two such diverse dates could be a legitimate Mint error. Dies are destroyed, if not worn out through usage, by the end of the year in which they are used. The coin in question is almost certainly a novelty or magician's coin.
If the two dates are 1776 & 1976 It's a bicentennial quarter and it's still worth a quarter If it's a state or territorial quarter, has two dates on the back and one of them is between 1999 and 2009 it's also just worth a quarter. If it has two heads with a date on each side it's a magician's coin - see the Related Question.
You can order these coins that have two heads or two tails. They are worth nothing other than the value of the coin. I have a two-tailed quarter which I thought might be worth a mint only to discover they are made and sold as novelty items. This is what I have discovered through research. You can call a coin collector and verify this information.
the 4th does. the 25th does.
Well, honey, it's simple science. The dates of maximum and minimum temperatures are determined by factors like sunlight and weather patterns, while the dates of maximum and minimum insulation are influenced by the thermal properties of the material. So basically, they're playing in different sandboxes, sweetie.
Trust me, it is not authentic. The 1979 dies were destroyed 13 years before the 1993 dies were made.
Nothing it is considered a magicians coin. They shave off one half of two quarters and then melt them together. On half will be thinner than the other.
Thick-Headed Tour - 2015 was released on: USA: December 2015
If you are referring to two separate coins, they are both high mintage WWII dates and are only worth the silver they contain -- currently about $1.25 each. If you mean you have a 2-headed coin with those dates, this is a novelty item with a value of a couple dollars.
The Red-Headed Monkey - 1950 was released on: USA: 7 July 1950
Two-Headed Giant - 1939 was released on: USA: 11 August 1939
It's just a Bicentennial quarter, spend it.
We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.We have no dates for the births of either of Cleopatra's brothers.
No, it's not possible that a double-headed quarter with two such diverse dates could be a legitimate Mint error. Dies are destroyed, if not worn out through usage, by the end of the year in which they are used. The coin in question is almost certainly a novelty or magician's coin.
If the two dates are 1776 & 1976 It's a bicentennial quarter and it's still worth a quarter If it's a state or territorial quarter, has two dates on the back and one of them is between 1999 and 2009 it's also just worth a quarter. If it has two heads with a date on each side it's a magician's coin - see the Related Question.
You can order these coins that have two heads or two tails. They are worth nothing other than the value of the coin. I have a two-tailed quarter which I thought might be worth a mint only to discover they are made and sold as novelty items. This is what I have discovered through research. You can call a coin collector and verify this information.
Quarter to Five - 2008 was released on: USA: 2008 (limited)