CCLV
((IV))(DCVIII)CCLV
It is: 510/2 = 255 which is the equivalent of CCLV in Roman numerals
They have no meaning because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals but CCLV = 255
The number 255 looks like 4 letters from the English alphabet which contains two c's, one l, and also one v. But all letters are put together in one group which looks like "CCLV". The way the Romans set u their number system is really easy to understand too. A "C" represents 100, a "L" represents 50, and the last letter "V" represents 5.
CCLV
It is: 255 = CCLV
((IV))(DCVIII)CCLV
It is: 510/2 = 255 which is the equivalent of CCLV in Roman numerals
They have no meaning because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals but CCLV = 255
The number 255 looks like 4 letters from the English alphabet which contains two c's, one l, and also one v. But all letters are put together in one group which looks like "CCLV". The way the Romans set u their number system is really easy to understand too. A "C" represents 100, a "L" represents 50, and the last letter "V" represents 5.
(positive number) x (positive number) = positive number (positive number)/(positive number) = positive number (positive number) x ( negative number) = negative number (positive number)/( negative number) = negative number (negative number) x (negative number) = positive number (negative number)/(negative number) = positive number
atomic number = number of proton in an element number of proton = number of electron mass number = number of proton + number of neutron therefore... atomic number = mass number - number of neutrons
A positive number. Positive Number x Positive Number = Positive Number Positive Number x Negative Number = Negative Number Negative Number x Negative Number = Positive Number
A real number which is not a rational number is an irrational number.
To find the number of neutrons from the mass number, subtract the atomic number from the mass number. The atomic number represents the number of protons in an atom, and by subtracting it from the mass number, you can determine the number of neutrons present.
There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.There is no number that is equivalent since a number is just that - a number. It is NOT a measure of time.