There can be no solution because there is no equation (or inequality) but only an expression.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoIt would be the same number either way because its addition.
P=2L+2W or P= L+L+W+W In conclusion, yes it does.
Y?
<p>MCMLXXVI</p> <p>or M + (CM) + (LXX) + VI</p> <p>or M + (M - C) + L + X + X + V + I</p> <p>or 1000 + 900 + 70 + 6</p> <p>or 1976</p>
=b+2h+r+x+z+q+a+p+l+f+g+d
The problem as stated does not allow for a solution for the value of S, however, the problem can at least be somewhat simplified. If m = p/5, then p + m can also be written as p + p/5, which simplifies to 1.2p so S = 1.2p
It would be the same number either way because its addition.
They stole the gems from L, M, N, O, and P.
Lines are parallel if they are perpendicular to the same line. Since the lines m and l are parallel (given), and the line l is perpendicular to the line p (given), then the lines m and p are perpendicular (the conclusion).
P=2L+2W or P= L+L+W+W In conclusion, yes it does.
Y?
M Malto Meal, Muslix S Shredded Wheat L P
1 0 pl m
A little more info would be nice but as it stands your equation is 2L + C = P
If: m = n+x/p then x = p(m-n)
M.-L. P. M. Weatherley has written: 'Estimated sulphur dioxide emissions from fuel burning in the United Kingdom and height of emissions, 1969 to 1974'
<p>MCMLXXVI</p> <p>or M + (CM) + (LXX) + VI</p> <p>or M + (M - C) + L + X + X + V + I</p> <p>or 1000 + 900 + 70 + 6</p> <p>or 1976</p>