These are integers that are less than 0. Counting backwards, they are -1, -2, -3, -4 etc. They are the additive inverses of the positive integers.
No, integers cannot be negative fractions. Integers are whole numbers that can be positive, negative, or zero, but they do not include fractional or decimal components. Negative fractions, on the other hand, are rational numbers that represent parts of a whole, which is distinct from the definition of integers.
This is the definition of the set of 'Integers'.
No, a negative integer cannot be greater than a positive integer. By definition, negative integers are to the left of zero on the number line, while positive integers are to the right. Since all negative integers are less than zero, they are always less than any positive integer. Thus, negative integers are always smaller than positive integers.
Depending on the definition of the words "natural numbers", the natural numbers are either, "the set of positive integers", that is, integers from 1 upwards, or "the set of non-negative integers", that is, integers from 0 upwards.Therefore, 0 can be included as one of the natural numbers, depending on your definition.
No. By the definition of a polynomial, the powers can only be non-negative integers.
a whole number negative or positive
No, integers cannot be negative fractions. Integers are whole numbers that can be positive, negative, or zero, but they do not include fractional or decimal components. Negative fractions, on the other hand, are rational numbers that represent parts of a whole, which is distinct from the definition of integers.
This is the definition of the set of 'Integers'.
No, a negative integer cannot be greater than a positive integer. By definition, negative integers are to the left of zero on the number line, while positive integers are to the right. Since all negative integers are less than zero, they are always less than any positive integer. Thus, negative integers are always smaller than positive integers.
Depending on the definition of the words "natural numbers", the natural numbers are either, "the set of positive integers", that is, integers from 1 upwards, or "the set of non-negative integers", that is, integers from 0 upwards.Therefore, 0 can be included as one of the natural numbers, depending on your definition.
An integer is either positive (non-negative), or negative, or zero. There are no negative non-negative integers.
No. By the definition of a polynomial, the powers can only be non-negative integers.
Non-positive integers are zero and the negative integers.
There are two conflicting definitions of a "natural number": these are "The set of positive integers", or "The set of non-negative integers".According to the first definition, the list of positive integers does not include 0. However, according to the second definition, this does include zero.
There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.
The product of three positive integers is positive, and the product of five negative integers is negative. When you multiply a positive number by a negative number, the result is negative. Therefore, the sign of the product of three positive integers and five negative integers is negative.
No. They are negative fractions, not integers.