The difference between Hieroglyphs and Babylonian number is how they look like, and how they work. Hieroglyphs have symbols base on 10's, so stroke for one, heel bone for 10, scroll for 100, and so on.... Babylonian numbers use only 2 symbols, which is for one, and > for 10.For Babylonian number, they also restart(?) them selves after 60, and the number position(?) is different when ever it reaches 60^X.Babylonian number lasted also longer then hieroglyphs. There! if you have any more question , you could search google, or wikepedia i guess(?). i hope this helped :D
Hindu Arabic is the number we use like 1,2,3,4........ Roman numbers are the numbers Romans were using like I,II,III,IV,V.........Improved Answer:The main difference between Hindu-Arabic numerals and Roman numerals is the absence of a nought figure in the Roman numeral system.
The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'
The Mayan system is more like Roman numerals than our Hindu-Arabic numbers. It has no sign for 6, for example, but must combine the sign for 5 and the sign for 1. Normal addition and subtraction and especially multiplication and division, as we understand these operations, were difficult if not impossible.
the number itself
Hindu-Arabic is our current number system while Babylonian numbers are an ancient number system which uses base 60 and uses only two symbols.
67295706
- The existence of 0. - Greek number is all alphabets, while the Hindu Arabic number is based on 10 different symbols.
The difference between Hieroglyphs and Babylonian number is how they look like, and how they work. Hieroglyphs have symbols base on 10's, so stroke for one, heel bone for 10, scroll for 100, and so on.... Babylonian numbers use only 2 symbols, which is for one, and > for 10.For Babylonian number, they also restart(?) them selves after 60, and the number position(?) is different when ever it reaches 60^X.Babylonian number lasted also longer then hieroglyphs. There! if you have any more question , you could search google, or wikepedia i guess(?). i hope this helped :D
Hindu Arabic is the number we use like 1,2,3,4........ Roman numbers are the numbers Romans were using like I,II,III,IV,V.........Improved Answer:The main difference between Hindu-Arabic numerals and Roman numerals is the absence of a nought figure in the Roman numeral system.
what is the differences betweenBabylon and Egyptian number system
Instead of or powers of 10, the Babylobians used powers of 60. So Babylonian 10 is decimal 60, and Babylonian 100 is decimal 3600. Decimal 1000 is 16x60 +40 =Babylonian (16)(40)
The difference between the greatest and least number is the range.
The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'
The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'
the difference between a number and 3 is
the difference between ine number and the next on the scale ?