Wiki User
∙ 12y agoOff the top of my head I'd say XXVIII (28). Another contributor's answer: I'd go for XVIIII (19).
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoWiki User
∙ 12y agoDuring the Roman era the equivalent of 19 was XVIIII which has 6 characters.
3.........III
The Romans had no character to represent zero.
On Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers ,we get : 11111111 in roman number Is : infinite number of Ms
On Converting between Arabic date and Roman Numbers we get: 5 in roman number stands for V.
putang ina di ko alam
XXVIII = 28
MCMXCV
3.........III
The Romans had no character to represent zero.
On Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers ,we get : 11111111 in roman number Is : infinite number of Ms
In order from highest to lowest, you would have the number MDCLXVI, which is equal to 1666.
Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers is done as : roman numeral number of 23 is : xxiii
On Converting between Arabic date and Roman Numbers we get: 5 in roman number stands for V.
putang ina di ko alam
On Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers ,we get : dec in roman numerals is : XII
On Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers ,we get : 7584 in roman number Is : MMMMMMMDLXXXIV
Roman numeral symbols are written from highest to lowest and from left to right. The equivalent to 559 in Roman numerals is DLIX. The number 558 is DLVIII and 560 is DLX.