Assuming you have done all of the necessary analysis and graph plotting, the next stage would be to write up your results in a report and derive an equation to describe the trend.
Then repeating the experiment to ascertain whether the results are repeatable would be a good idea!
Scientific MethodThe scentific method sets for a process for investigating the world around us. It is a multistep process that begins with identifying a question. This is followed with the development of a hypothesis, in other words, an educated guess as to what you think will happen or how you think the question will be answered. The next step is to construct an experiment. To do that you need to make a list of the steps and procedures for the experiment and then you must gather the equipment to carry out the experiment. Performing the experiment is obvious, but just as important is recording the results of the experiment and drawing a conclusion about what the experiment said about your original question and your hopothesis.
Because there are so many things that happen - some predictably, some coincidentally - that all fall into the category of random "chance" - it's this way one time, that way the next. Statistics are carefully calculated to have a cut-off point, below which is considered to be within the category of "random". Above that figure, it is more frequent than "random" can explain. At that point, it becomes - to a greater or lesser degree - "statistically significant". A simplistic example: If a child has a school year 180 days long, and the child is "home sick" seven out of those 180 days, that is within the realm of random. If the child is "home sick" 57 of those 180 days, that is "statistically significant".
2,793,149 rounded to the nearest hundred thousand would be 2,800,000. The "hundred-thousands" place is 7, and the next most significant digit is 9. If the next-most-significant digit is 4 or lower, we round down; if it's 5 or greater, we round up. Since the "next-most-significant digit" is 9, we round up from 7 to 8.
The number 151.208, when expressed to two significant figures, is 150. This is because the first two significant figures are '1' and '5', and rounding the next digit (which is '1') leads to a decrease in the last significant figure. Therefore, the rounded value is 150.
The first step in taking any number to 1 significant figure is to find the greatest non-zero digit. In this case it is the 2, as that represents 2 tenths. The next step is to look at the next digit on. If it is 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 we need to round up. Otherwise, we can leave it as it is. The next digit is 0, so we don't need to round up. Therefore 0.209 rounded to 1 significant figure is 0.2
After the experiment, the next step in the scientific method is to analyze the data collected from the experiment. This involves organizing and interpreting the results to draw conclusions about the hypothesis.
When conflicting results occur in an experiment, it's important to first review the experimental procedures to check for any errors or inconsistencies. Next, analyze the data to identify any potential sources of variation or confounding factors that may be affecting the results. Finally, consider repeating the experiment with adjustments to the procedures or conditions to see if the conflicting results can be resolved.
First you ask a question about what you want to learn, Then you do some research, Next you construct a hypothesis, Then you test the hypothesis by doing an experiment, Next you Analyze your data and draw a conclusion, Communicate your results. And that is the hypothesis.
Conducting an experiment
you must repeat and redo the experiment
After forming a hypothesis, the next step in the scientific method is to design and conduct an experiment to test the hypothesis. This involves collecting data and analyzing the results to determine if the hypothesis is supported or refuted.
Absolutely Analyzing the data from your failed experiment, allows to form some new theories and draw conclusions to move forward into your next bit of research. This failure, so to speak, can be used as the impetus for your next adventure in discovery. The answer is just around the corner.
The conclusion in your scientific reports should include: * what were the assumptions and what results were you expecting before doing the experiment * what method(s) or approach(es) did you use in the experiment * what are the results? * do your results agree or support with your assumptions? If yes, why? If no, what do you suggest to do for the next experiment. Preferably, the conclusion is much shorter than the body of your report. One paragraph can suffice, but try to keep it less than 2 typewritten pages. Be concise. Keep your sentences short. This section may be the only one that your peers or superiors will read. ==================
First, review the experimental design and execution to ensure they were carried out correctly. Next, consider if there were any external factors influencing the results. If necessary, adjust the experimental conditions, controls, or variables and repeat the experiment to verify the findings.
R:recall-describe what you did (briefly) E:explain-tell the purpose of the study R:results-state the results including the hypothesis that was supported U:uncertainties-what might have affected your experiment N:new/next time-what new things did you learn/what would you do differently next time
VERY!!! im sat next to her. Statistically she should be in a mental hospital along with her friend.. not naming any names... ;)
After forming a hypothesis, the next steps in the scientific method are to design and conduct an experiment to test the hypothesis, collect and analyze data from the experiment, and finally draw conclusions based on the results. If the results support the hypothesis, it may be considered valid; if not, the hypothesis may need to be revised or rejected. Additionally, the findings should be communicated to others for further validation and exploration.