Nothing has 1 order of rotational symmetry because in rotational symmetry 1 is none.
It does have rotational symmetry of order three.
A parallelogram has rotational symmetry of order 2.
parallelogram * * * * * A parallelogram does have rotational symmetry (order 2).
It has 1 order of rotational symmetry.
Oh, dude, an oval has an infinite number of lines of symmetry, so technically it has infinite rotational symmetry. But like, who's really gonna sit there and rotate an oval forever just to prove a point, right? So, yeah, infinite rotational symmetry for the win!
Rotational symmetry counts how many times a shape will fit onto itself when it is rotated 360°. When an oval (I assume you mean an ellipse) is rotated it will fit onto itself after 180°, thus it has rotational symmetry (of order 2).
Yes. An ellipse (oval) has two lines of symmetry, but not a rotational symmetry. A parabola has one line and no rotation.
A line has rotational symmetry of order 2.
Nothing has 1 order of rotational symmetry because in rotational symmetry 1 is none.
It has rotational symmetry to the order of 2
Are you referring to the Marquise Cut in Diamond jewelry? This is in the shape of a pointed oval; it would two-fold rotational symmetry.
If it is a regular octagon then it has rotational symmetry to the order of 8
It does have rotational symmetry of order three.
no shape does! * * * * * Not true. A parallelogram has rotational symmetry of order 2, but no lines of symmetry.
A parallelogram has rotational symmetry of order 2.
parallelogram * * * * * A parallelogram does have rotational symmetry (order 2).