0
What else can I help you with?
What are the positive or negative of nafta and gatt?
NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) facilitated increased trade and economic integration among the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, boosting economic growth and creating jobs in certain sectors. However, it also faced criticism for job losses in manufacturing due to offshoring and concerns over labor and environmental standards. GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) promoted global trade by reducing tariffs and trade barriers, fostering international cooperation. Conversely, it was criticized for favoring developed nations and not adequately addressing issues related to agriculture and developing countries' interests.
What is an example of unwarranted extrapolation?
Making huge predictions about the future on the basis of a few small facts. Example: if the U.S. approves NAFTA, thousands of jobs and factories will move to Mexico
How has NAFTA affected different people in different ways?
NAFTA has had varied impacts on different groups; for some, particularly consumers and businesses in the U.S. and Mexico, it led to lower prices and expanded markets. However, it also resulted in job losses in certain U.S. manufacturing sectors, as companies relocated to Mexico to take advantage of lower labor costs. In Mexico, while some industries benefited from increased trade, others faced challenges as local farmers struggled to compete with subsidized U.S. agricultural products. Overall, the agreement has created both opportunities and challenges, reflecting the complexity of its economic implications.
What is the difference between regional integration and globalization?
An example of regional integration would be NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, where the countries of North America agreed to integrate commerce. Globalization would be where countries around the world agree to a common cause.
Who was the 42 presidentmof the us?
The 42nd president of the United States was Bill Clinton, who served from January 20, 1993, to January 20, 2001. A member of the Democratic Party, he was previously the governor of Arkansas before his presidency. Clinton's administration is known for economic prosperity, the implementation of welfare reform, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). His presidency also faced significant controversies, including impeachment in 1998.
Why is it hard to gauge the economic effects of NAFTA?
yes NAFTA did happen
Studies indicate that NAFTA's overall impact has been?
Studies indicate that NAFTA's overall impact has been small but positive. NAFTA stands for the North American Free Trade Agreement.
The north American free trade agreement nafta has what?
benefitted the Canadian economy
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has .?
benefited the Canadian economy
Why some canadians worry about nafta?
They fear there economy is too dependent on the United States
NAFTA argued that it ould help the US economy?
This not a question, so I don't know how to answer it.
Did NAFTA have a positive or negative impact on trade?
It is a positive thing that this was put in place but I think it allowed US born companies to move outside the borders when the American worker became too expensive to employ and allowed those companies to trade within the borders allowing for positive returns on short investments.
Positive externalities in the automobile industry?
supply and demand, NAFTA, over seas competition
What the effects of NAFTA on the US?
It removed the trade barriers set before by the U.S. , Mexico, and Canada
In 1992 the US Canada and Mexico signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). What was one of the effects of NAFTA?
Many tariffs on goods traded between these countries were eliminated.
What are 3 cons of nafta?
- companies get relocated and can cu jobs - canadian economy depends on the usa's economy too much - transportation across the boarder creates alot of pollution
What affect has a NAFTA had on Latin America?
NAFTA, implemented in 1994, significantly impacted Latin America by increasing trade flows, particularly between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, which led to economic growth in the region. However, it also resulted in job losses in certain sectors, particularly agriculture, as cheaper imports flooded local markets. Additionally, while it stimulated foreign investment, the benefits were uneven, often exacerbating income inequality. Overall, NAFTA reshaped economic dynamics in Latin America, with both positive and negative consequences.
