The probability is 1. And the same is true for any other digit.
This counter-intuitive result can be proved as follows:
Ignore numbers with leading zeros.
There are 9 1-digit numbers of which 8 do not contain any 2s;
There are 90 2-digit numbers of which 8*9 do not contain any 2s;
There are 900 3-digit numbers of which 8*9*9 do not contain any 2s;
and so on.
The total number of k digit numbers is 9 + 90 + 900 + ... + 9*10^(k-1)
= 9*[10^k-1]/[10 - 1] = 10^k - 1
Of these, the count of numbers which do not contain any 2s = 8 + 8*9 + 8*9^2 + ... + 8*9^(k-1)
= 8*[9^k-1]/[9 - 1] = 9^k - 1
So the probability that the numbers do not contain any 2s is [9^k - 1]/[10^k - 1] which, as k gets larger, approaches 9^k/10^k = (0.9)^k which tends to 0.
So, the probability that the number DOES contain at least one 2 = 1 - Pr(It contains none) = 1 - 0 = 1.
least two-digit composite number = 11
Even number are those that can be divided by 2.First 4-digit number is 1000 but this is not oddSo, the least 4-digit odd number is 1001
123456789
One hundred is the least three-digit square number. It is formed by 102.
4
4 is the least one digit composite number
least two-digit composite number = 11
10 is the smallest 2 digit number.
Even number are those that can be divided by 2.First 4-digit number is 1000 but this is not oddSo, the least 4-digit odd number is 1001
123456789
One hundred is the least three-digit square number. It is formed by 102.
It is 0.6050
The number 8 in that question is the number with the least amount of value (0.008).
4
The probability of getting at least one prime number in two dice is 3/4.
6
997 is the last 3 digit prime number