It is probably "jumping to a conclusion". There is nothing in the question about any analysis, or validation of hypotheses.
The process of reasoning that arrives at a conclusion based on previously accepted general statements is Deductive reasoning. Alternatively, Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning that arrives at a conclusion via observation (think of hypothesis).
deductive reasoning
Generalization !
This would be an hypothesis (an educated guess).
It is faulty logical reasoning. For example,1^1 = 1*1 2^2 = 2*2 conclusion: n^n = n*n WRONG!
The process of reasoning that arrives at a conclusion based on previously accepted general statements is Deductive reasoning. Alternatively, Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning that arrives at a conclusion via observation (think of hypothesis).
Inductive
deductive reasoning
Generalization !
This would be an hypothesis (an educated guess).
It is faulty logical reasoning. For example,1^1 = 1*1 2^2 = 2*2 conclusion: n^n = n*n WRONG!
It's an inference or inferInference is the conclusion drawn which is based on observations and prior knowledge. It involves the mental process of combining what is read or seen with relevant prior knowledge.
An empirical conclusion.
theory
Inductive Reasoning foo
A conclusion is the end of something and summing up things
a conclusion