Prime numbers, like 29, don't have proper factors.
2 and 29
Since the numerator of the fraction is prime, and not a factor of the denominator, the proper fraction 29/100 is already in simplest form.
The factor form of 29 is simply ( 29 ) itself, as it is a prime number and cannot be factored into smaller positive integers. The repeated multiplication of 29, representing it as a product of itself, can be written as ( 29^1 ), which is just 29. If you were to express it with more than one factor, you could write ( 29 \times 1 ), but the essence remains that 29 is a singular factor.
No.
No, 294 is not a proper factor of 147. Proper factors are smaller than the number of which they are a factor. The proper factors of 147 are 3, 7, 21, 49, and perhaps 1, depending on the definition you are using.
2 and 29
2 and 29
841 is the square of a prime. 29 is the only proper factor of 841.
29 is a prime number and hence does not have any factors. So, there is no number that is a proper factor for both 29 and 32
a proper factor is a factor.
It can be. 29 is a factor of 58.
Since the numerator of the fraction is prime, and not a factor of the denominator, the proper fraction 29/100 is already in simplest form.
2, 4, 7, 14, 28, 29, 58, 116, 203, 406
2, 4, 7, 14, 28, 29, 58, 116, 203, 406
The factor pairs of 29 are 1 and 29. 29 is prime so it has only one factor pair.
No. Prime numbers don't have proper factors.
Since 29 is a factor of 116, the GCF of 29 and 116 is 29.