It is often a "goodness of fit" test. This is a test of how well the observations match the frequencies that would have been expected on theoretical basis. The theoretical basis may simply be your hypothesis.
Z Test
Any decision based on the test statistic is marginal in such a case. It is important to remember that the test statistic is derived on the basis of the null hypothesis and does not make use of the distribution under the alternative hypothesis.
Unknown. The first IQ test was published in 1916 by Binet and I doubt Wright was tested. It is reasonable to assume he had a high IQ.
It can be.
give the government the benefit of the doubt.
it is but chkeas
rational basis (apex)
rational basis (apex)
Most schools usually do ACT's over the SAT's, but i believe either test is reasonable. Some people test better than others on the ACT's then the SAT's and vise versa.
See this link.
The Wechsler Scale is an example of an intelligence test that would be administered on an individual basis.
Apex-type question, reworded to preserve answer
If it is a NON-invasive test, such as an exercise test, it might be reasonable. But if it is an INVASIVE test, such as muscle biopsy, then no it would not be reasonable, especially on an otherwise HEALTHY young girl.
reasonable suspicion
What reasonable suspicion essentially means is that if a law enforcement officer believes that he or someone else is in danger he has the right to check someone for weapons. The basis is "would a reasonable person see this as a threat. If the answer is yes there are likely grounds for reasonable suspicion.
It is often a "goodness of fit" test. This is a test of how well the observations match the frequencies that would have been expected on theoretical basis. The theoretical basis may simply be your hypothesis.