It they weren't equal is wouldn't make a tessellation.
they both measure the angle in degrees
If you want mathematical precision then the answer is that there need not be any angles at all and so there can be no angle relationship. Shapes like dumb-bells will tessellate, and these will have no angles. There are very many other shapes: see MC Escher's Symmetry artwork for examples.
The COEFFICIENT of Refraction.
consecutive angles
It they weren't equal is wouldn't make a tessellation.
No, the relationship between the angle of incidence and the angle of reflection remains the same regardless of the angle of incidence. This relationship is governed by the law of reflection, which states that the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection.
A+
Hi im bob
If you want mathematical precision then the answer is that there need not be any angles at all and so there can be no angle relationship. Shapes like dumb-bells will tessellate, and these will have no angles. There are very many other shapes: see MC Escher's Symmetry artwork for examples.
The tangent of an angle equals the inverse of an angle complementary to it. The relationship between the two tangents is that they are multiplicative inverses.
they both measure the angle in degrees
Both angles are equal.
The COEFFICIENT of Refraction.
look it upp
They both have to do with whether or not people get sunlight or if they don't.
vertical angles