There is no such thing.
People used the body mass index (BMI), which is a ratio of mass (not weight) to the square of the height. A BMI of 18.5 to 25 kg/m2 is considered normal. Below 18.5 is underweight and above 25 is overweight. Above 30 is obese.
However, the people who promoted this measure appear to have overlooked the very basic fact that muscles are denser than fat. So, two people can have the same height. If one of them is muscular and has a BMI of just over 25 whereas the other carries a lot of fat and has a BMI of 24.5, the first one is fitter, not fatter!
Chat with our AI personalities
There is no weight ratio for height. The weight of an object depends on its the volume and density. The volume depends on the height as well as the average cross section so height, alone, cannot determine weight.
BMI: 24.6257988. If you do not round to 25 then you are in the normal range but barely.BMI = (mass(lb) * 703)/ (height(in))^2BMIAbbreviation:Body mass index.bod·y mass in·dexNoun:A weight-to-height ratio, calculated: dividing one's weight in kilograms by the square of one's height in meters
base by height
Weight is not worked out on age it is worked out on height. i am 12 years going onto 13 i weigh 11 stones is that right or not it really depend on the height and size of the bones
It is pounds. An inch is the measuring unit for height. A pound is the measuring unit for weight. The logic is as follows. height, weight -> (measuring unit for height), (measuring unit for weight) Some similar examples, If it were "height, distance and inches." the missing word would be "miles" If it were "height, age and inches." the missing word would be "years"