0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you convert 5000 to scientific notation?
The term is written as: 5000.0 After 3 zeroes, there is a decimal place. To convert 5000 into scientific notation, move 3 decimal places to the left and include the base 10 to ³ to get: 5.0 x 10³ This is how you do the conversion of the scientific notation.
What is the correct scientific notation for the number 5000?
5 x 103.
What is 5000 in scientific notation?
5 x 103 or 5 * 10^3
What is 45 5000 000 000 in scientific notation?
455,000,000,000 = 4.55 x 101145.5000 000 000 = 4.55 x 101
How do you convert 0.000089 into scientific notation?
It is 8.9*10^-5 in scientific notation
How would you write 5000 in scientific notation?
5*103
How do you convert 5000 to scientific notation?
The term is written as: 5000.0 After 3 zeroes, there is a decimal place. To convert 5000 into scientific notation, move 3 decimal places to the left and include the base 10 to ³ to get: 5.0 x 10³ This is how you do the conversion of the scientific notation.
What is the correct scientific notation for the number 5000?
5 x 103.
What is 5000 in scientific notation?
5 x 103 or 5 * 10^3
What is 45 5000 000 000 in scientific notation?
455,000,000,000 = 4.55 x 101145.5000 000 000 = 4.55 x 101
How do you convert 0.000089 into scientific notation?
It is 8.9*10^-5 in scientific notation
What is scientific notation in parentheses?
It is "(scientific notation)".
What is 27 in scientific notation?
It is: 2.7*10^0 in scientific notation
What is 0.000098 in scientific notation?
This number in scientific notation is 9.8x10-5.
What is the scientific notation for 89.450?
The scientific notation for 89,450 is: 8.945 × 104
What is the scientific notation of 9.32x105?
9.32 x 105 already is in scientific notation.9.32 x 105 already is in scientific notation.9.32 x 105 already is in scientific notation.9.32 x 105 already is in scientific notation.
What is the opposite of scientific notation?
There is no true opposite of scientific notation, but the closest answer is Standard Notation.
