Perimeter and area are not sufficient to determine the shape of a figure.
Yes.
a 4*5 rectangle.
The simplest shape is a 6ft*3 ft rectangle.
No. Consider two rectangles: 1 x 10 and 4 x 5 The 1 x 10 has a perimeter of 22 and an area of 10 The 4 x 5 has a perimeter of 18 and an area of 20 Smaller perimeter, twice the area.
Perimeter and area are not sufficient to determine the shape of a figure.
Yes if you
It depends. What shape is it? And is it equilateral or not?
Yes.
a 4*5 rectangle.
Actually it is possible.
The simplest shape is a 6ft*3 ft rectangle.
No. Consider two rectangles: 1 x 10 and 4 x 5 The 1 x 10 has a perimeter of 22 and an area of 10 The 4 x 5 has a perimeter of 18 and an area of 20 Smaller perimeter, twice the area.
The perimeter and area of a shape do not provide sufficient information. With a given perimeter, the largest area that you can enclose is a circle, but you can then flatten the circle to reduce its area. Similarly, in terms a of quadrilaterals, a square has the largest area, but it can be flexed into a rhombus whose area can be made as small as you like. All that can be said is that there is no shape with a perimeter of 12 units whose area is 12 square units.
Surface area is the perimeter (amount of space around a shape) around a shape. For example: I have a rectangle So: 3+3=6 9+9=18 18+18=36cm2
Yes. Use excel with 18 boxes. Offsetting the boxes will get you the right answer.
18