You must know the perfect squares in order to answer this question, which are as follows: {1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49,......}. So, 17 is in between 16 and 25, so the next perfect square would be 25.
No. There are no integers that when multiplied by themselves equal 17.
The smallest number that can multiply 68 to get a square number is 17. This is because 68 can be expressed as 2^2 * 17, which means it already contains a factor that makes it a square number when multiplied by 17. Therefore, 17 is the smallest number that can achieve this result.
Not sure I understand the question. 17 is rational but the square root of 17 is irrational.
No
the square root of 17 is not a perfect square, so it can't be reduced to a rational number. √17 ≈ 4.1231 but the decimal place keeps going on forever
NO 17 is not a square number, but 16 is.
The square of 17 is 289.
because you cant square a number to get 17, that's why xD
No. There are no integers that when multiplied by themselves equal 17.
The smallest number that can multiply 68 to get a square number is 17. This is because 68 can be expressed as 2^2 * 17, which means it already contains a factor that makes it a square number when multiplied by 17. Therefore, 17 is the smallest number that can achieve this result.
The square root of 289 is 17 since 172 or 17 * 17 = 289
Not sure I understand the question. 17 is rational but the square root of 17 is irrational.
17,as 289 is the square of 17
It is: 17 times 17 = 289
No
No
the square root of 17 is not a perfect square, so it can't be reduced to a rational number. √17 ≈ 4.1231 but the decimal place keeps going on forever