No. There are no integers that when multiplied by themselves equal 17.
The smallest number that can multiply 68 to get a square number is 17. This is because 68 can be expressed as 2^2 * 17, which means it already contains a factor that makes it a square number when multiplied by 17. Therefore, 17 is the smallest number that can achieve this result.
Not sure I understand the question. 17 is rational but the square root of 17 is irrational.
No
the square root of 17 is not a perfect square, so it can't be reduced to a rational number. √17 ≈ 4.1231 but the decimal place keeps going on forever
NO 17 is not a square number, but 16 is.
The square of 17 is 289.
because you cant square a number to get 17, that's why xD
No. There are no integers that when multiplied by themselves equal 17.
The square root of 289 is 17 since 172 or 17 * 17 = 289
Not sure I understand the question. 17 is rational but the square root of 17 is irrational.
17,as 289 is the square of 17
It is: 17 times 17 = 289
No
No
the square root of 17 is not a perfect square, so it can't be reduced to a rational number. √17 ≈ 4.1231 but the decimal place keeps going on forever
The square roots are -4.1231 and +4.1231, approx.