Yes
Until an "equals" sign shows up somewhere in the expression, there's nothing to prove.
If the 64 has a minus sign, then the solution is x = +/-5 Simplifying gives 4x squared = 100 ie x squared = 25...
Without an "equals" word or sign somewhere, there is nothing to solve.You only have an expression, not an equation.
(4/9) x = That's not an equation. If there were a number after the 'equals' sign, then we could calculate the value of 'x'. But as it is, there's no question there, so there's nothing to solve.
Yes
Until an "equals" sign shows up somewhere in the expression, there's nothing to prove.
x^(2)-16=0 Take the -16 over to the other side of the equal sign, the -16 will turn +16. x^(2)=16 Then take the squared root of both sides. x=4
When we say "negative 10 squared," we are asking for the result of squaring the number -10. Squaring a number means multiplying it by itself, so (-10) squared is (-10) x (-10), which equals 100. The negative sign is not squared along with the number itself; it simply indicates that the result is negative.
Simple equation lad. In your example, you said n=4 and x= n squared + n - 1 + (n-2)squared + (n-3)squared. You simply write n²+n-1+(n-2)²+(n-3)² I hope that is what you mean by what you say. P.S. To get the to the power of sign, hold alt and press 0178 for ², and 0179 for ³
positive times positive equals positive negative times negative equals positive positive times negative equals negative Substitute "divided by" for "times" in the previous sentences and they are still true.
If the 64 has a minus sign, then the solution is x = +/-5 Simplifying gives 4x squared = 100 ie x squared = 25...
They are terms of an expression because without an equality sign it is not an equation.
Without an "equals" word or sign somewhere, there is nothing to solve.You only have an expression, not an equation.
A fraction that has a different sign to the first fraction.
No, three squared is nine. 3(squared sign) =3x3 =9
(4/9) x = That's not an equation. If there were a number after the 'equals' sign, then we could calculate the value of 'x'. But as it is, there's no question there, so there's nothing to solve.