13 is not a fraction and so its decimal equivalent is 13.
Whole numbers
There is only one number that equals 13. That number is . . . . . 13.
The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.
The ancient Romans had no need for such large numbers but its equivalent in scientific notation would be: I*X^XIII which is 1.0*10^13
Mixed numbers come from improper fractions. 3/13 is proper.
13 is not a fraction and so its decimal equivalent is 13.
Whole numbers
5 and 13 are both prime numbers.
There is only one number that equals 13. That number is . . . . . 13.
26
The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.The 13 consecutive numbers from 114 to 126 are composite.
No, they are not equivalent.
they are almost all equivalent - whole numbers also have the number 0, which natural numbers (counting numbers) do not.
Both are already Prime Numbers.5 and 13 are both prime numbers.
7 and 13, yes 15, no.
The ancient Romans had no need for such large numbers but its equivalent in scientific notation would be: I*X^XIII which is 1.0*10^13